- The Bitcoin Compass ๐งญ
- Posts
- Everyone's saying crypto is dead again!
Everyone's saying crypto is dead again!
Plus, a Bitcoin company got hit by a rumor that turned out to be false.
Your employees are connecting AI to everything. Now what?
ChatGPT and Claude don't just answer questions anymore. Employees are connecting them directly to Notion, Linear, Jira, and the rest of your stack. The AI can read, write, and take actions on company data. Most IT and security teams have no visibility into any of it.
Harmonic Security Connectors changes that. It sits inline with every AI-to-app connection, so you see each call, control what data moves, and block destructive actions before they happen. Employees notice nothing different.
See what's actually running across your business in a live demo.
Bitcoin's trading near $63,000 this week, and if you've asked ChatGPT anything about crypto lately, chances are you've run into some version of "crypto is dead" in the answer.

Meanwhile, a well-known crypto figure just pointed out that Bitcoin's usable supply might be smaller than the headline number suggests, which is a very different kind of energy.

A Bitcoin company also got hit with a sale rumor that turned out to be false. None of this adds up to the industry falling apart. It adds up to a normal rough week getting louder than it needs to be. Keep reading.
๐ The Translation
Bitcoin's usable supply might be smaller than the 21 million number everyone quotes, according to the Binance founder himself. ๐ข
What happened: Binance founder Changpeng Zhao recently said that just over 20 million Bitcoin have now been mined, roughly 95.6% of the 21 million that will ever exist.
He also estimated that 10โ20% of all mined Bitcoin is permanently lost, whether from forgotten passwords, lost devices, or other mishaps, meaning it can never move again.
Why it matters: If that estimate is right, the Bitcoin actually available to buy, sell, or hold is meaningfully smaller than the headline 21 million cap suggests, somewhere closer to 16โ18 million coins that can ever realistically change hands.
The Compass take: Nobody can verify the exact number of lost coins, and estimates from different analysts range widely. But the direction is the important part: scarcity isn't just about the 21 million cap, it's about how much of that cap is actually reachable. It's a good reminder that "supply" and "usable supply" aren't the same thing.
"Crypto is dead" chatter is rising again. Here's why that phrase tends to show up at exactly the wrong time to believe it. ๐
What happened: Researchers at Santiment flagged a rise in "dying" and "finished" language across crypto social media.
An AI chatbot was asked how low Bitcoin could theoretically fall, and it described a scenario requiring a global liquidity shock, mass institutional selling, and a full crisis of confidence happening all at once, that could in theory send Bitcoin below $10,000.
Why it matters: Santiment's own data shows this exact kind of "crypto is dead" language has spiked before, including as recently as June, and each prior spike was followed by a market rebound rather than confirmation that things actually fell apart.
The Compass take: A worst-case scenario existing on paper isn't the same as it being likely. The people describing $10,000 or $2,000 Bitcoin are explicit that it would require several extreme things to happen at once, not just an ordinary rough quarter. Fear language spreading fastest right when prices feel stuck is exactly the pattern worth recognizing, not reacting to.
A Bitcoin treasury company got hit with sale rumors that turned out to be false. ๐ข
What happened: Metaplanet, a Tokyo-based company that holds Bitcoin on its balance sheet, denied selling any of its holdings after data trackers flagged a $320 million Bitcoin transfer linked to its wallets. The company's CEO said it was a routine transfer between its own custody addresses, not a sale, and confirmed the company still holds all 43,000 of its Bitcoin.
Why it matters: On-chain data can show that coins moved, but it can't always tell you why. A transfer between a company's own wallets looks identical on the blockchain to an actual sale until someone confirms which one it was.
The Compass take: This is a good one to file under "wait for confirmation before reacting." The rumor spread fast because another major Bitcoin holding company has been selling recently for unrelated reasons, and it was easy to assume the same story applied here. It didn't.
๐ Beginner's Corner โ Choosing a Bitcoin wallet isn't about finding "the best one." It's about matching the wallet to what you're actually doing.
There's no single best Bitcoin wallet, and anyone telling you otherwise is skipping the actual question.
The real question is simpler: what are you using this Bitcoin for, and how much responsibility do you want to carry yourself?

Every wallet falls into one of two categories, and this is the only decision that actually matters at the start.
Custodial wallets are run by a company, like an exchange, that holds your private keys for you. You get convenience: easy setup, account recovery if you forget a password, customer support if something goes wrong. What you're trading for that convenience is trust. Your Bitcoin is only as safe as that company's security and business decisions, the same lesson we've covered with exchange shutdowns in past issues.
Non-custodial wallets put you in full control. Nobody can freeze your funds, and nobody but you holds the keys. That control comes with zero safety net. Lose your seed phrase, and there's no support line to call. No password reset exists.
Neither one is the "responsible" choice and neither is the "beginner" choice. A custodial wallet is genuinely fine for small amounts you're actively learning with. Once you're holding something you'd truly hate to lose, that's usually the point people start moving toward non-custodial, often through a hardware wallet like the ones we've covered before.
Beyond that core decision, a few things are worth checking before you settle on one: whether the wallet has a clear, well-documented way to back up and recover your seed phrase, whether it's been around long enough to have a track record instead of just good marketing, and whether it's open-source, meaning independent people can actually verify the code does what it claims.
You now know: the wallet question isn't "which one is best." It's "how much control do I want, and how much responsibility am I ready to carry for that control?" Answer that first, and the actual wallet choice gets a lot easier.
๐ญ The Long View
We have seen "crypto is dead" before. We saw it in 2018. We saw it in 2022. Each time, the language spread fastest when prices felt stuck, and each time, it turned out to be a signal about mood, not Bitcoin's actual future. Nine years in, the pattern is more predictable than the price is.
๐ง Reader's Question
You may be asking: "If non-custodial wallets have no support line, isn't that just riskier?"
It's a different kind of risk, not automatically a bigger one. A custodial wallet trades your risk of losing your own keys for the risk that the company holding them makes a bad decision, gets hacked, or shuts down, all things we've covered happening to real exchanges.
Non-custodial risk is entirely on you, but it's also entirely within your control. Neither eliminates risk. They just move where it sits.
๐ One Thing To Do
Check what kind of wallet your Bitcoin is actually sitting in right now, custodial or non-custodial, and confirm that matches how much of it you would genuinely hate to lose.
๐๐ป The Close
Weeks with loud "it's over" chatter are usually the ones worth the least reaction, not the most. That's not us telling you to ignore risk. It's us telling you where nine years of watching this cycle actually points.
Reply and tell us whether you're on a custodial or non-custodial wallet right now, and why. And if this issue helped cut through some noise, forward it to the one friend who's been sending you "crypto is dead" tweets this week.
โ The Bitcoin Compass
UseTheBitcoin.com ยท Trusted since 2017
Build a Holiday Creator Affiliate Program in 90 Days
Creators lock in holiday content calendars 90 days out, before brands figure out commissions. Waiting too long to launch an affiliate program means less runway to build demand and a missed shot at the best partnerships.
The 90-Day Holiday Sprint covers commissions, recruiting, and scaling a program at Day 30, 60, and 90.


